![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, January 5, 2006 Britain Brassed Off About Call CentersIn May 2004, the BBC aired a program called Brassed Off Britain, which talked about "the UK's top ten consumer gripes." I happened upon the website for this program while looking for an article on a UK bank that decided to stop using scripts for its agents. Agents who stick to scripts, of course, are one of the things that "brass off" Brits about call centres. I mean centers. Call centers were topic number nine in the month-long series that included episodes on junk mail, banks, and car-buying. From the Call Centre section, I learned that:
In the chat section of the website, there's a transcript from a live chat wherein a guy named Phil Taylor fielded questions about call centers, some from call center workers. Taylor is described as a "reader in Industrial Relations at the University of Stirling," and someone who "has conducted extensive research into the call centre industry for over a decade." Here's a sample question: Question from Liam: What did we used to be before call centres - and why are we whinging for? They're just a result of choice, which is what we/consumers want. Right? Phil Taylor: Liam, this is a very good question. Call centres grew very rapidly from the early 1990's onwards. Take banking for example, previously you would have gone to your High Street bank for a range of services. What transformed the banking and financial sectors were the introduction by First Direct and Direct Lines of 24/7 operations. As a result all banks followed suit and created centralised telebanking operations. The advantages were cost-cutting. Obviously there are and were advantages associated with being able to pick up the phone and get a service completed by that medium without delay and without necessarily leaving the house. However, customer advantage was only ever part of the call centre package, and cost reduction through the centralisation of customer servicing was the principal driver which did lead to the closure of many High St banks. The following complaints are listed in the "What Brasses You Off?" section of the call center segment:
That last one struck me. I'm used to the anger about outsourcing, off-shoring, and shipping jobs overseas, but whenever I read about attitudes about Indian call centers in the UK, there's an extra degree of bitterness about it that I don't see in America. Which brings me to a news item about Lloyds bank call centers in the UK stopping the use of scripts. The Scotsman reported on it today, and it was much like the Manchester Evening News coverage yesterday, but there was a little more about the bank's Mumbai, India center, which employs 1,300. Here is what the Scotsman said about that: A recent union survey of nearly 2,000 branch managers at Lloyds TSB found that 96 per cent thought customers were not happy dealing with staff in India, while 83 per cent thought customers received worse service as a result. Ironically, staff in India are the only ones at Lloyds TSB not to have used scripts. Last year, Abbey switched call centre work back to Scotland and England from India, announcing plans to shut a centre in Bangalore. It followed growing complaints from customers, which included language problems. My questions are: Do Brits complain about bad service from Indian call centers than Americans? Are UK callers angry at bad service, or just foreign service? Here's the advice Indian columnist Nasha Fitter gave to call center workers suffering rude callers after the London subway bombings in July of last year: 1. Remember, it is not about you Posted by Harry Sheff on Thursday, January 5, 2006 at 1:45 PM |
Free CallCenter Insider Newsletter
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||