![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, February 27, 2006 Getting Tired of Paul English Yet?If you read the Q&A on our front page, you know that EIG's Rex Stringham is. And believe it or not, so are we. Sensational call center stories are hard to come by though, so when I saw the New York Times on Sunday, I was excited. William C. Taylor, founding editor of the hip business magazine Fast Company wrote a nice piece on English and the Great IVR Debate, but if you've been following Mr. English's media arc, you won't find any new ideas, just new commentators. The most interesting parts of Taylor's article aren't about Paul English. The reason we're getting tired of Paul English is because he's a one-trick pony: he's got a complaint, and his function isn't to change anything -- only the call centers can do that. But the rest of Taylor's article is worth talking about because much of it echoes what we've been saying for a while.
Mr. Taylor writes:
How indeed? We at Call Center have been saying it. So have some of the better vendors of speech and IVR systems. Who isn't getting it yet? How hard can it be? Why is this still an issue? Taylor spoke to Richard Shapiro, of the Center for Client Retention, a company that measures customer service satisfaction through targeted phone interviews. "You create more value through a dialogue with a live agent. A call is an opportunity to build a relationship, to encourage customers to stay with the brand. There can be a real return on this investment." Maybe, but why am I skeptical? Because I don't want a relationship with a company, much less its call center. I want my problems solved. See our editor Keith Dawson's thoughts on customer happiness in his editor's page last October. Taylor talks about Commerce Bank, a company he credits with "injecting a playful spirit into a notoriously bland business." That's great, as long as it doesn't degenerate into employees offering "free smiles" and institutionalized "flair" à la Office Space. Taylor notes: "To be sure, few companies can summon the everyday exuberance of Commerce Bank. But there is another cost-effective strategy for enhancing the human element: make the company so easy to do business with that fewer customers call with problems, which frees resources to meet the needs of those who do call." That's true, and it reminds me of what Keith said in his editor's page: "The quickest way to create “happy customers” is to take advantage of the expectation gap that people walk in with. They expect a certain level of service. If you exceed it, you create interaction happiness." But why do people call the call centers in the first place? I only call when something's wrong. Aren't most people like that? Taylor's next commenter is Mark Hurst of Creative Good, a consulting firm: "The reason people are dialing the 1-800 number is that they're having a bad experience in some other channel. If e-commerce were much, much simpler, a huge percentage of these calls would never be made." Finally, as an exhibit of the concept above, Taylor talks to ING Direct, an online bank that has such simple services that their customers hardly ever call. "The key word for us is simplicity. If you eliminate service charges and hidden fees, you eliminate most of the problems and complaints. Then the only reason for people to call is to do business. And those are calls you're eager to take," said ING's Jim Kelly. Posted by Harry Sheff on Monday, February 27, 2006 at 12:07 PM |
Free CallCenter Insider Newsletter
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||