Events Training Consulting Newsletters Webcasts Blogs
Subscriptions
Current Issue
Past Issues
Join Our Mailing List
Contact Us
Home
 
 
 

 


TechEncyclopedia

ADSL Lite: The Plot Lightens

It's the version that will serve most of us into the foreseeable future.

print this article print this article
email this article e-mail this article
.

.

10/21/2001, 1:44 PM ET

We've spent the last several lessons working through some important DSL technologies and issues. We started off with HDSL (High-Bit-Rate DSL), and then examined some of the common characteristics and limitations of DSL in a lesson I dubbed DSL: Do You Qualify? (Initially, I didn't qualify, then I qualified on a limited basis, and now I qualify fully.)

In the last lesson, we explored ADSL (Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line), the original ADSL version. Now we're ready to dig into ADSL Lite. That's the version with which many of us are familiar, the one I'm having installed, and the one that will serve most of us into the foreseeable future.

Background

ADSL, as you'll recall from the last lesson, runs over a UTP (Unshielded Twisted Pair) local loop provided by the ILEC (Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier). At distances up to 18,000 feet, a qualified loop can support simultaneous voice, data and entertainment TV transmission.

The TV capability was offered in test markets, but hasn't been offered commercially to the general market as it is so difficult to support over all but the most exceptional local loops. So, that leaves us with voice and data.

Voice is supported in its native analog format via a 4 kHz channel. Data transmission is supported at various signaling rates, with the maximum rates being sensitive to the specifics of the local loop. Those specifics include wire gauge(s), number of splices, loop length, bridged taps, and crosstalk, as we discussed in DSL: Do You Qualify?

ADSL is asymmetric in nature, at least with respect to data transmission. Significantly more bandwidth is provided downstream than upstream, for technical reasons of signal attenuation and crosstalk.

Fortunately, this approach matches most user requirements in terms of Internet access, as most of the action happens on the downstream side. If you're running a Web-based business with a server on your premises, your transmission requirements are exactly the reverse, with most of the action happening on the upstream side, and ADSL is not for you.

The analog voice channel, of course, is symmetric.

So, What's ADSL Lite?

ADSL Lite, also known as G.lite and Splitterless ADSL, is an interoperable extension of full-rate ADSL, also known as G.dmt after the DMT (Discrete MultiTone) modulation technique employed. (The G comes from the ITU-T standards designation G.922.1 for ADSL and G.922.2 for ADSL Lite.)

ADSL Lite works just like ADSL in virtually every respect. The same DMT modulation technique is used, the same asymmetry applies, the same local loop qualification issues arise, and the same speed ratings apply. The big difference is that ADSL Lite requires no centralized splitter (also known as a modem or filter) at the customer premises.

That means that no truck roll is required on the part of the telco to install an ATU-R (ADSL Terminating Unit-Remote). In my case, rather, the telco mailed me a DSL modem, some software, and five (5) microfilters for my telephone sets.

The attached figure that I borrowed from my book, Communications Systems & Networks, illustrates a typical ADSL Lite configuration.

The ADSL modem plugs into the RJ-11 wall jack on one side and into the workstation on the other. As the inside wiring, of course, is shared between the workstation and the telephone sets, the effect is that of multiple bridged taps on the line -- they're just inside the premises rather than down the street.

So, you plug microfilters between the telephone jacks and the sets. The microfilters serve to filter out any electrical and RF anomalies when phones ring, or one or more go off-hook to answer a call or on-hook to terminate a call.

That's about it. If everything goes just right, ADSL Lite works just great. The natural expectation, of course, is that the inside wire bridged taps will have an impact on performance -- and they will. Usually, they're not that much of a problem, and it's a fair enough tradeoff for the reduced costs of installation and service.

Remember that you install ADSL yourself, at least on the premises side of things. The telco does its thing at the CO (Central Office), where an ATU-C (ADSL Terminating Unit-Centralized) resides, just as was the case with the original full-rate ADSL.

So, while ADSL Lite really isn't completely splitterless, it certainly is splitterless at the premises. The ATU-C terminates in a DSLAM (DSL Access Multiplexer) collocated in the CO. If the ILEC is also your ISP, the telco-owned DSLAM connects to the Internet backbone via a high speed circuit such as a T1, T3, or SONET fiber optic facility.

If you use another ISP, its collocated DSLAM connects to its offices via a high speed facility. Traffic destined for the Internet backbone connects over another high speed facility, perhaps looping right back through the same CO.

What about Speed?

ADSL Lite can run at the same speeds as full rate ADSL, which can be as high as 6.144 Mbps downstream and 640 Kbps upstream, although that is very unusual due to the demands such high speeds place on the local loop cable plant. As a practical matter, ADSL Lite more typically tops out at 1.536 Mbps (T1) downstream, and 256 Kbps upstream. In my case, through Verizon, my options are as follows:

Downstream
Upstream
Bronze Plus ≤768 Kbps ≤128 Kbps
Enhanced Bronze Plus ≤1.536 Mbps ≤128 Kbps

So, that's the essentials of ADSL Lite in 1,000 words, or so. As my more loyal readers know, I'm currently waiting, as I write this column, with bated breath for my ADSL Lite service to be installed.

(For more on Professor Ray's ongoing DSL ordeal, check out his threaded messaging postings, titled "True Lies" and "Professor Ray's DSL Saga" in both the DSL: Do You Qualify? column and ADSL.)


| 1 | 2 | Next Page > >
Message Boards - Show Replies

Where's Layer 2? : (Moderated by Keith Dawson ) :

DSL Lite: The Saga Concludes

Search: | Post New Topic | Post A Reply |
Author Topic:    DSL Lite: The Saga Concludes
JAMES HORAK posted 11/13/2001 03:34 AM EST    Edit Reply

Well, it's time to conclude my personal DSL saga. We've been up and running here for about three weeks, with only an occasional hiccup. The same goes for the 802.11 WLAN.

I managed to find a way to test my DSL speed, by the way, and you may want to do the same. According to DSL Reports (www.dslreports.com/stest), I'm getting about 840 Kbps downstream and 99 Kbps upstream. That's not the 1.536 Mbps and 128 Kbps I was hoping for, but it's a lot better than I was getting from my 56 Kbps modem.

I ran another test through telus.net, which indicated that my download throughput was 1.2771392 Mbps, which I like a lot better. My actual transmission speed, of course, is dependent on a number of factors, including the processing speed of my computer (it's a new Dell 4300 Dimension running at 1.8 GHz, so we can rule that out.), whether or not I'm performing CPU-intensive tasks at the time (I wasn't.), traffic on the Internet (who knows at any given moment?), and the speed of my LAN (that shouldn't have been a problem, since my desktop is hardwired and runs at 100 Mbps, but it could be an issue in terms of a slight bottleneck at the interface between the Ethernet router, the DSL modem, and the DSL circuit itself.).

Now, we did have an occasional problem with throughput. In fact, it dropped to the abysmal level of 2 Kbps downstream and 65 Kbps upstream. That definitely was not what I was looking for. At the suggestion of my ISP, I called Verizon. The nice folks there checked to verify that my DSL connection was configured and provisioned correctly. It was, but they reset it anyway. That didn't help.

My ISP tried to ping me, but I had to disable my firewall, which I did. The ping worked, but the results of their speed tests were abysmal. After all of this nonsense, the solution turned out to be simple. I did a hard reboot of both the WLAN Access Point + Ethernet Switch + DSL Router, and the DSL modem. In other words, I unplugged them and plugged them back in. It was a low-tech, no-tech solution, but it worked.

Occasionally, the problem resurfaces, in which case we reboot and the problem is solved. Occasionally, the wireless links don't seem to work quite right, in which case we reboot and the problem is solved. Go figure!

Speaking of my firewall, I also did a leak test on my firewall. It passed with flying colors. Check out www.grc.com, and select the LeakTest option. It seems to be a great tool.

In any event, I'm a very happy guy right now. My thanks to the folks at Verizon. I take back some (but not all) of my criticisms of them. (As an old Bell-head and ex-CON (CONTEL, which used to serve this area before it was acquired by GTE, which then was acquired by Bell Atlantic, which renamed itself Verizon), I think I'm entitled to criticize them from time-to-time.)

My thanks also to the nice folks at Connect Northwest, my new ISP. My thanks also to Brett Parker, the network genius who did all of the hard stuff to get my new network configured properly.


 

 

Search: | Post New Topic | Post A Reply |
 

This is a public forum. CMP Media and its affiliates is not responsible for and does not control what is posted herein. CMP Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers. Community standards in the message center do not permit hate language, excessive profanity or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this forum becomes the property of CMP Media LLC.

Important Note: The Message Center is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.

.

Free CallCenter Insider Newsletter

Your Email Address


Optional Areas of Interest
International News
Advice/Tips
Technology
Agent Development
IVR